Reply to the Wife of Gyōbu Saemon-no-jō Chapter1

Reply to the Wife of Gyōbu Saemon-no-jō Chapter1

Background

THIS month I received your letter informing me that, as the third day of the tenth month marks the thirteenth anniversary1 of your mother’s death, you are enclosing an offering of twenty thousand coins.

The more than three thousand volumes that make up the non-Buddhist classics have as their very core the two concepts of loyalty and filial piety, while the more than five thousand volumes of Buddhist scriptures have as their eye that of filial devotion. It seems that the sun and moon begrudge their light to one who is unfilial, and that the gods of the earth look upon such a person with wrath. A certain sutra tells us that at one time all the living beings of the six paths of existence gathered in the presence of the Buddha, and the Buddha questioned each of them about their personal circumstances. Addressing the gods of the earth, he said, “Tell me, is there anything that is weightier than the great earth?” The gods of the earth replied in a reverent manner that there was indeed something weightier than the great earth.

“You earth gods!” said the Buddha. “Why do you utter such distortions! This major world system of ours in all its parts sits upon the great earth. Mount Sumeru, which measures 168,000 yojanas in height and 3,360,000 ri in breadth, the great ocean, which is 84,000 yojanas in length and breadth, as well as all the living beings and the plants and trees—all these rest upon the great earth. Since the earth is capable of upholding all of these, how could there be anything that is weightier than it?”

The earth gods replied, “Since the Buddha knows the answer, he is perhaps asking so that others may be informed of it. We earth gods have existed for twenty-nine kalpas, and during all that time, we have held up and supported the great earth without suffering any pain in our necks or our backs. Moreover, while holding it up, we run about in space, now east, now west, now south, now north, and yet we do not feel that it is weighty. It is only the place where an unfilial person dwells that is heavy, heavier than we can bear. It causes our necks to ache, our backs to feel as though they would break, our knees to weaken, our feet to become immovable, our eyes to swim, and our spirits to fail. Ah, when we encounter a place where a person of unfilial conduct dwells, we think again and again how we would like to cast off the earth and throw it away! That is why the earth constantly trembles in the place where an unfilial person dwells.

“So it was with the man called Devadatta. He was a cousin of Shakyamuni Buddha, the lord of teachings, and a member of the royal clan, one of the most highborn persons in the continent of Jambudvīpa. Nevertheless, he was unfilial, and for that reason we could not hold up the earth under him. So the earth split apart and he fell into the hell of incessant suffering. Our strength was powerless to prevent it.”

Thus did the gods of the earth expound in detail to the Buddha, and the Buddha nodded in agreement, saying, “Indeed, indeed!” And then the Buddha sighed and said, “After I have passed away, people will be even more unfilial in their conduct than Devadatta was. They will surpass even Kokālika.” (This is the essence of the sutra.2)

The Nirvana Sutra says that, in the evil world of the latter age, unfilial persons will be more numerous than the dust particles of the land, while those who perform their filial duties with devotion will be fewer than the specks of dirt that can be placed on a fingernail.

 

Background

Nichiren Daishonin wrote this letter in response to an offering of twenty thousand coins from the wife of Gyōbu Saemon-no-jō in Owari Province, which she had made to honor the thirteenth anniversary of her mother’s death. The identity of her husband is not certain, but from the large offering of coins she was able to provide, it appears he was a samurai of considerable rank.

Though the year is not indicated, the letter is thought to have been written in 1280.

The Daishonin begins by citing a story from a sutra about an exchange between the Buddha and the earth gods on the importance of filial piety, the commitment and actions to repay the debt of gratitude one owes to one’s parents. He emphasizes that the debt owed to one’s mother is especially profound, describing in moving detail the sufferings a mother endures in giving birth to and caring for her children.

He then praises as extraordinary the filial devotion of the wife of Gyōbu Saemon-no-jō in making offerings on behalf of her late mother. While parents’ devotion to their children is not uncommon, it is rarer for the child to respond in kind. Next, he delves more deeply into the concept of filial piety in Buddhism. The Classic of Filial Piety, a Confucian text, addresses only devotion to one’s living parents, while failing to consider their next existence. Buddhism, on the other hand, deals p.899with saving one’s parents not only in this life, but also after their death. However, he asserts, there are distinctions in the Buddhist teachings.

To illustrate this, he cites the famous story from Buddhist scriptures of Maudgalyāyana’s efforts to rescue his deceased mother from the realm of hungry spirits. This story is held as a model of Buddhist filial devotion. But although Maudgalyāyana relieved his mother of the agony of hunger, there is no mention of his enabling her to attain Buddhahood.

The Daishonin explains that even Shakyamuni Buddha could not save his own departed parents until he preached the Lotus Sutra. He expresses his conviction, therefore, that Shakyamuni Buddha preached the Lotus Sutra in order to enable all people to help their deceased parents attain Buddhahood.

The Daishonin closes by confirming that the filial devotion of Gyōbu’s wife based on faith in the Lotus ensures that her mother “will make her way to the pure land of Eagle Peak,” that is, attain Buddhahood.

Notes

1. The so-called “thirteenth anniversary” is actually the twelfth anniversary of a person’s death. According to Japanese custom, the second year following a person’s death is regarded as the third anniversary. Hence there is one year’s discrepancy in the number of anniversaries. Japanese hold memorial services on the 7th, 49th, and 100th day after a relative’s death, and then on the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 13th, 17th, 23rd, 27th, 33rd, and 50th anniversaries.

2. Which sutra the Daishonin refers to here is uncertain.

Copied title and URL