Daily Gosho

religion

On Repaying Debts of Gratitude

Nichiren

Chapter6(Demonstrating the Lotus Sutra’s Absolute Supremacy)

Main Text

Someone might doubt my words, saying that, although the Lotus Sutra is the finest among all the sutras that have been brought to China and Japan, in India, in the palaces of the dragon kings, the realms of the four heavenly kings, the realms of the sun and moon, the heaven of the thirty-three gods, or the Tushita heaven, for instance, there are as many sutras as there are sands in the Ganges. Among these, may there not be one that is superior to the Lotus Sutra?

I would reply that, by looking at one thing, you can surmise ten thousand. This is what is meant by the statement that you can come to know all under heaven without ever going out of your garden gate. But a fool will have doubts, saying, “I have seen the sky in the south, but I have not seen the sky in the east or west or north. Perhaps the sky in those other three directions has a different sun in it from the one I know.” Or he will see a column of smoke rising up beyond the hills, and although the smoke is in plain sight, because he cannot see the fire itself, he will conclude that the fire may not really exist. Such a person is my questioner, an icchantika, or person of incorrigible disbelief, no different from a man with sightless eyes!

In the “Teacher of the Law” chapter of the Lotus Sutra, the Thus Come One Shakyamuni, uttering words of absolute sincerity from his golden mouth, establishes the relative superiority of the various sutras he expounded during the fifty or so years of his preaching life, saying, “The sutras I have preached number immeasurable thousands, ten thousands, millions. Among the sutras I have preached, now preach, and will preach, this Lotus Sutra is the most difficult to believe and the most difficult to understand.”

Though this statement is the declaration of a single Buddha, the Thus Come One Shakyamuni, all the bodhisattvas from the stage of near-perfect enlightenment on down should honor it and have faith in it. For the Buddha Many Treasures came from the east and testified to the truth of these words, and the [emanation] Buddhas assembled from the ten directions and extended their long broad tongues up to the Brahmā heaven just as Shakyamuni Buddha did. Afterward, they all returned to their respective lands.

The words “have preached, now preach, and will preach” include not only the sutras preached by Shakyamuni in his fifty years of teaching, but all the sutras preached by the Buddhas of the ten directions and three existences without setting aside a single character or even a single brushstroke. It is in comparison to all of these that the Lotus Sutra is proclaimed to be superior. At that time the Buddhas of the ten directions indicated their agreement beyond all doubt. If, after they had returned to their respective lands, they had told their disciples that there was in fact a sutra that is superior to the Lotus Sutra, do you suppose their disciples would ever have believed them?

If there are those who, though they have not seen it with their own eyes, nevertheless suspect that there may be a sutra superior to the Lotus Sutra somewhere in India or in the palaces of the dragon kings, the four heavenly kings, or the gods of the sun and moon, I would say this. Were not Brahmā, Shakra, the gods of the sun and moon, the four heavenly kings, and the dragon kings present when Shakyamuni preached the Lotus Sutra? If the sun and moon and the other deities should say, “There is a sutra superior to the Lotus Sutra; you merely do not know about it,” then they would be a sun and moon who speak great falsehoods!

In that case, I would berate them, saying: “Sun and moon, you dwell up in the sky rather than on the ground as we do, and yet you never fall down—this is because of the power you gain by observing most strictly the precept of never telling a lie. But now if you tell this great lie by saying there is a sutra superior to the Lotus Sutra, I am certain that, even before the kalpa of decline arrives, you will come plummeting down to earth. What is more, you will not stop falling until you have reached the depths of the great citadel of the hell of incessant suffering that is surrounded by solid iron! Beings who tell such great lies should not be allowed to remain a moment longer in the sky, circling above the four continents of the earth!” That is how I would berate them.

Yet such men of great wisdom, such great teachers and Tripitaka masters as Ch’eng-kuan of the Flower Garland school or Shan-wu-wei, Chin-kang-chih, Pu-k’ung, Kōbō, Jikaku, and Chishō of the True Word school, proclaim that the Flower Garland and Mahāvairochana sutras are superior to the Lotus Sutra. Though it is not for me to judge in such matters, I would say that, in the light of the higher principles of Buddhism, such men would appear to be archenemies of the Buddhas, would they not? Beside them, evil men such as Devadatta and Kokālika are as nothing. In fact they are in a class with Mahādeva and the Great Arrogant Brahman. And those who put faith in the teachings of such men—they too are a fearful lot indeed.

 

Lecture

From this point, the text seeks to establish that the Lotus Sutra is supreme above all.
First, a hypothetical objection is raised and resolved; next, passages from the “three declarations of superiority” are cited to clarify that, among all the sutras taught throughout the Buddha’s lifetime as well as those of the Buddhas of the ten directions and three existences, the Lotus Sutra is the foremost.

The initial hypothetical objection is this:
Even if the scriptures transmitted from India to China, and from China to Japan, place the Lotus Sutra above all others, might there not exist somewhere in the vast world an even more superior scripture unknown to us?

To this, it is taught:
“One may fathom all by understanding one,” and, “Without ever stepping beyond the garden of one’s dwelling, one may know the world.”

Furthermore, the text says that foolish people, seeing the sun in the southern sky, imagine that there may also be separate suns in the east, west, or north; or, upon seeing smoke rising beyond a mountain, they doubt whether fire exists because they cannot directly see it.
Such people are called icchantikas—incorrigible unbelievers—or “living blind.”

Yet even today, despite the astounding advance of material civilization, religion remains filled with such icchantikas and the uninformed.
Those who do not know the Soka Gakkai all fall into this category.
That is, even when they hear of the benefits of the Gohonzon of the Essential Teaching—Nichiren Daishonin’s supreme purpose for appearing in this world—they refuse to believe.

They say things like:

  • “All religions are the same no matter what you believe.”

  • “If you feel gratitude toward your object of devotion, that is fine for you; I am different.”

  • “No object of worship can be absolutely supreme; there may be something better elsewhere.”

Such opinions are common not only among ordinary people but even among so-called scholars and critics—who speak without knowing the essence of Buddhism, the philosophy of life itself.
All of these people can be declared icchantikas, utterly ignorant of religion.

Next is the passage known as the “three declarations of superiority,” found in the Teacher of the Law (Hōshi) chapter of the Lotus Sutra:

“The scriptures that I have preached, now preach, and will preach in the future are immeasurable in number, tens of millions of myriads. Yet among them, this Lotus Sutra is the most difficult to believe and understand.”

Here, “previously preached” refers to all pre-Lotus teachings,
“currently preached” to the Immeasurable Meanings Sutra,
and “to be preached” to the Nirvana Sutra.
The reason this Lotus Sutra is “most difficult to believe and understand” is precisely because it is the highest, foremost sutra.

Moreover, this supremacy applies not only within Śākyamuni’s lifetime teachings but among all sutras preached by Buddhas throughout the ten directions and the three existences.
This is because the Expedient Means chapter proclaims:

“Just as all Buddhas of the three existences teach according to a single method,
so too do I now teach in the same manner.”

Furthermore, even within the Lotus Sutra itself, there are distinctions—
the trace teaching (shakumon), the origin teaching (honmon), and the hidden depths (montei).
The following passages, cited later, show that in contrast to all provisional and pre-Lotus teachings, even the trace teaching of the Lotus Sutra is difficult to believe and understand, and is supreme.

Nichiren Daishonin states in the The Object of Devotion for Observing the Mind Established in the Fifth Five-Hundred-Year Period after the Thus Come One’s Passing:

“Among the sutras I have preached, now preach, and will preach, this Lotus Sutra is the most difficult to believe and the most difficult to understand.” The “six difficult and nine easy acts” he expounds in the next chapter explains how difficult it is. (WND1, p.363)

Again:

The Great Teacher Dengyō remarks, “The Lotus Sutra is the most difficult to believe and to understand because in it the Buddha directly revealed what he had attained. (WND1, p.363)

And again:

He revealed the hundred worlds and thousand factors inherent in life, but he did not expound their eternal nature. Since the theoretical teaching of the Lotus Sutra thus directly reveals a part of the Buddha’s own enlightenment, it excels all the other sutras that the Buddha had preached, now preached, or would preach, and is the correct teaching that is difficult to believe and difficult to understand. (WND1, p.368)

The next passage shows that Nichiren Daishonin overturns all earlier teachings—including the pre-Lotus and the trace teaching—and establishes the origin teaching of the Lotus Sutra.

All these teachings that fall into the three categories of preaching66 are therefore easy to believe and easy to understand. In contrast, the essential teaching, which transcends the three categories, is difficult to believe and difficult to understand, for it directly reveals the Buddha’s own enlightenment. (WND1, p.368)

In the Latter Day of the Law, the three great secret laws—the hidden depths of the “Life Span of the Thus Come One” chapter—are the most difficult to believe and understand and are supreme.
In comparison, the twenty-eight chapters of the Lotus Sutra taught by Śākyamuni, including both trace and origin teachings, become merely “easy to believe and easy to understand”—teachings adapted to others.

Nichiren writes:

The doctrine of three thousand realms in a single moment of life is found in only one place, hidden in the depths of the “Life Span” chapter of the essential teaching of the Lotus Sutra. (WND1, The Opening of the Eyes, p.224)

And again:

The essential teaching of Shakyamuni’s lifetime and that revealed at the beginning of the Latter Day are both pure and perfect [in that both lead directly to Buddhahood]. Shakyamuni’s, however, is the Buddhism of the harvest, and this is the Buddhism of sowing. The core of his teaching is one chapter and two halves, and the core of mine is the five characters of the daimoku alone. (WND1, The Object of Devotion for Observing the Mind Established in the Fifth Five-Hundred-Year Period after the Thus Come One’s Passing, p.370)

”The Power of the Upper Grade of the Precept Against False Speech”

Comments

Copied title and URL